Category Archives: Racists

“Racial Loyalty” means racism

The Washington Post states in an article today that:

“There is a certain amount of racial loyalty and party loyalty, but eventually that was going to have to weaken,” said Andra Gillespie, a political scientist at Emory University, who studies African Americans.

“Racial Loyalty”???  Is that the new PC term for racism?  When the KKK and the NAZIs talk about “racial loyalty” it is negative and it should be for anyone who cares more for skin color than character.

 

Racist Democrat Jim Clyburn plays the race card

[T]he president’s problems are in large measure because of the color of his skin.  – Jim Clyburn, May, 25, 2011

Rep. Clyburn needs to understand that just because he is a racist and judges people based on the color of their skin, it doesn’t mean that most people do.  In fact most people don’t care about your skin color.  Get over it, the “racism” card could have played 40 or 50 years ago, but not any more.  Let’s look at his comment:

1. President Obama is elected, and then the racism starts?  Give it up, that is crazy.

2. According to the President, he is half-white, and felt like he was coming home to Ireland.  But so what.  President Obama’s skin color does not matter.  Or is Rep Clyburn embracing the “one drop” theory from two centuries ago?  One would hope he was more knowledgable and intelligent than that.

Most of President Obama’s critics base their criticism on policy.  There are few who are old-fashioned dinosaurs like Rep. Clyburn who believe that the color of someone’s skin is at all relevant, but most people realized how stupid that was decades ago.

Skin color is irrelevant just as eye color and hair color are.  The racist is the one hiding behind skin color to avoid legitimate criticism.

Is this “The New Civility” at work again?  When you can’t counter an argument you rely on scaring people and playing the race card.

It is great to note though that not a single member of the democrat controlled Senate voted for the Obama Budget proposal this year.  Are Obama’s troubles in the Senate due to the “color of his skin”?

CBS Bob Schieffer calls Trump a racist for discussing racism

Schieffer stated that Trump’s questions about Obama’s school grades were an ‘ugly strain of racism’.

Let’s see how this works.  Colleges admissions departments can treat people differently due to the color of their skin. Rephrased, colleges can discriminate against one group of people due to their ‘race’.  Apparently CBS’ Bob Schieffer thinks that racist behavior is acceptable.  However, if you discuss that fact that people can be treated differently by college admission departments, you are a racist.  According to an illogical, Schieffer, the discriminatory action itself is not racist, but discussing the act is racist.

Welcome to the insane 1984-ish world of racist CBS News anchors where discussing discrimination based on skin color is racist while discriminating based on skin color is not.

 

Obama’s broken promise: I’ll help jobless blacks – Racists at USA Today

The racists at USA Today are at it again, lamenting (yet another) of President Obama’s broken promises, which as USA Today states as “Obama’s broken promise: I’ll help jobless blacks“.

A simple question for USA Today:  What is the different between “jobless blacks,” “jobless hispanics,” or “jobless whites”?  Why is a “jobless black” more important than anyone else?

Why the focus on something as stupid as skin color? Ah yes, the racists have to focus on skin color in order to divided people. Dividing people is the way to keep people from seeing the real problem is those who want to rule instead of those who want freedom.

I want to know the jobless rate of people with green eyes, the jobless rate of people with shorter than average noses and the jobless rate of people with brown eyes.  Hazel and blue eyes?  Maybe next week.  Not to mention the jobless rate of people with freckles.

 

Blaming Terry Jones for Violence in Afghanistan

General Petraeus stated that burning the Quran “was hateful, it was intolerant and it was extremely disrespectful and again, we condemn it in the strongest manner possible.”  Harry Reid added that the Quran burning by Pastor Terry Jones in Florida was “a publicity stunt” and stated that “I think people should understand the consequences of what they do under the guise of religion.”  People are blaming Terry Jones for the deaths in Afghanistan.

Let’s look at some of the ramifications of ignoring the First Amendment (and the rest of the Constitution) and property rights when convenient. First, Terry Jones, the flag burners, bible burners, Andres Serrano (“artist” of “Piss Christ”) – among others – are morons and some of the dumbest people around.  However, in the United States they do have the right to do what they do, whether or not it is right to do so.  Burning any book, flag or being disrespectful is not something anyone I know would do, but compared to the fanatical, terrorist, radical Muslims who killed and beheaded U.N. workers, the burners look sane.

However, people are blaming Terry Jones for the deaths in Afghanistan, let’s try and trace other “blame” following that same “logic”.  Some examples:

* If the KKK were to say “If blacks don’t ride at the back of the bus, then we’ll kill someone”.  Then you have “blacks” (I don’t like the term) who don’t ride at back of the bus and the KKK kills people and says, “But it was the black’s fault, we warned them” that it would occur.  Is it reasonable to blame the KKK or the “blacks”?  After all the KKK was angry and the “blacks” didn’t follow the rules set out by a bunch of radicals.  Of course, that is not reasonable.  The blame lies with the crazy people who committed the violence and no one else.

* If I eat pork or cow post it on YouTube and someone in Isreal or India is insulted and starts rioting, who’s fault is it?  The people rioting.  No one else.  They need to grow up and take responsibility for themselves.

* Perhaps Andres Serrano is responsible for Terry Jones and consequently Afghanistan because he may have been the one that got Terry Jones angry with the “Piss Christ” “art”?  Or perhaps it was the hypothetical college professor who is to blame for teaching Andres Serrano that intolerance of others is acceptable and should be considered “art”?  How far back does the blame go?  Blaming anyone else for Terry Jones is as reasonable as blaming anyone else for the insanity of extremists in Afghanistan.

* What if a group of people said “If you perform an abortion, we’ll start rioting.”  An abortion occurs and riots start, is it the fault of the Doctor who performed the abortion?  Of course not.  It is the responsibility of the people rioting.

Similarly, it is the responsibility of the people who did the killing in Afghanistan for their actions.  Face it, they are radical and extremists.  If they aren’t mature enough to handle reality except through violence, it shows just the nature of the individuals involved.  We have freedom of speech and expression in the United States, you don’t like it?  Too bad, they’ll just keep showing their immaturity and radical nature.

 

Helen Thomas tells Jews to go back to Germany

Helen Thomas tells Jews to go back to Germany. Once Helen Thomas, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barack Obama and the rest of Congress and the administration return to the native lands of their forefathers, then they can bring this up. After all, if you go back far enough no one is from the United States. If you only go back 500 years, well, everyone knows the history. How long has there been a Jewish presence in Israel? 4000 years or more?

Helen Thomas, racist and anti-semite.

Helen Thomas says: “Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine. Remember, these people are occupied and it’s their land. Not Germany. Not Poland.” When asked what the Jews should do, Thomas said “They go home. Poland. Germany. And America and everywhere else.”

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/abraham/detail??blogid=95&entry_id=65122#ixzz0q0LfPFZ7

Red Cross supports terrorists – Taliban, Hamas, Darfur

CNN reports that “the International Committee of the Red Cross is defending its practice of providing medical training and basic medical supplies to the Taliban in Afghanistan.”  In other words, the Red Cross is supporting the terrorists in Afghanistan – for four years!  The Red Cross also states “it has provided similar training in Darfur, Sudan and to Hamas members in Gaza.”  So the Red Cross supports terrorists in Sudan, Hamas, and racist genocide in Darfur.  What a wonderful illustration of the problems with the Red Cross.

As if it makes it all okay, the Red Cross says it is not “training the Taliban in surgical skills; the focus [is] on stabilizing those injured.”   Stabilizing injured terrorists makes it okay for the Red Cross – stabilizing terrorists so they can then come back and attack again.

When the Red Cross chooses to support individuals that intentionally try to kill innocent people, they are no longer neutral, the Red Cross has picked a side, the side of killers.

What a wonderful mission the Red Cross has undertaken, it is sick to help people who are intentionally out to kill innocent civilians. No one who values freedom should send any financial support to an organization like the Red Cross that supports a terrorist organization bent on violence and destroying the liberty of free people through terror.