Police put 42 rounds into a car with toddler and mom after robber had carjacked their car.
“We had a very volatile situation,” Sheriff John Rutherford told the Florida Times Union. “I just don’t want to try to speculate on why they felt the need to shoot at the suspect while he was in the vehicle.”
“White House complains about CBS News [Washington Post] blog post saying that possible Supreme Court nominee is gay.”
So, my question is, what is wrong with being gay? Does the White House have a problem if she is gay? Is there anyone except the White House who cares?
[May 10, 2010 Update:] Elena Kagan’s friends: She’s not gay [Politico]. Again, is there something wrong with being gay that everyone is having a spasm about it? Who cares if she is or isn’t?
“I’m glad they’re fighting over health care and everything else. Let them have at it. But I think that all you have to do is read the paper every day to see how many people there are who are deeply, deeply troubled.” Former President Clinton, April 16, 2010.
The former President is correct, there are many deeply troubled people out there, but the ones who are deeply troubled are the ones who don’t believe in freedom, but believe that their needs justify the seizure of someone else’s means to meet them. The deeply troubled people are the ones who wish to control the country instead of promoting freedom and the belief that each person is able to and responsible for controlling their own lives. The deeply troubled people are the people who believe that liberty means freedom for them to control others by force. The most deeply troubled people out there, however, are the ones who will lie, cheat, and deceive in order to pervert the meaning of the Constitution and freedom for their own power. Only a truly disturbed and troubled person would want to control others. Only a deeply disturbed person would want to have the power of life and death over an entire country.
World leaders arriving in Washington for President Obama’s Nuclear Security Summit must have felt for a moment that they had instead been transported to Soviet-era Moscow. … In the middle of it all was Obama — occupant of an office once informally known as “leader of the free world” — putting on a clinic for some of the world’s greatest dictators in how to circumvent a free press. Dana Milbank, Washington Post, April 14, 2010.
White House ‘Czar’ John Holdren says “we can’t expect to be number one in everything indefinitely.” Certainly not, if we’re no longer a free country. With Freedom, anything is possible: